Cultivating a Defense Against Global Warming (internet archive)
All we have to do is turn the temperate zones of the planet into one great big irrigated Iowa cornfield and the ice caps will be saved and we can all drive about between these rows of corn on E-85 in our new GM flexfuel vehicles.
We’ve been warned about the impact of CO2 and discontinuing the use of those fossil fuels in our cars and trucks and irrigation of more semi-arid cropland to grow fuel is just
the ticket according to…….
Won’t that be cool. Thank goodness for the ICE effect. Isn’t science great!
It is absolutely amazing what you can learn from computer climate models.
None of that old layman common sense for us modern thinkers here in the US of A. We’ve got university scientists getting big grants to tell us what to believe.
This article illustrates for the critical reader the need for vigilance and skepticism of the current “scientific consensus” of global warming and just how poorly climate scientists
understand the basic physics of the forces that surround them.
If you can’t find the obvious flaw in the thinking of this article, you couldn’t possibly begin to understand the global warming issue or maintain any skepticism of the CO2 centric explanation for it put forth in the media.
This is a perfect example of the junk science and flawed climate models that predict gloom and doom for the future climateof the earth.
Agriculture and agricultural irrigation are the primary cause of the anthropogenic warming of earth’s climate system, not a mitigating factor.